Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies

2005-02-13 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Err... FWIW, aforementioned patch lacks e.g. vmlinux.lds.S. Yeah, I have that fixed locally. I just haven't pushed out the new stuff yet. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a m

Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies

2005-02-13 Thread Al Viro
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:12:54PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > 1. To support a separate build tree for the um/i386 architecture the > > following changes have been done: > > Have a look at > > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.11-rc3-mm2

Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies

2005-02-13 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > 1. To support a separate build tree for the um/i386 architecture the > following changes have been done: Have a look at http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.11-rc3-mm2/patches/cross-build That's Al Viro's take on the same problem, plus -

[PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies

2005-02-13 Thread Vadim Abrossimov
1. To support a separate build tree for the um/i386 architecture the following changes have been done: - fix makefiles to generate new files and to create symlinks in the '' only - in particular, to solve the issue of 'arch/um/include/sysdep-', the same technique as for 'include/asm' has been use