On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:29:09 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:18:47AM +, Ahbong Chang wrote:
> > It does not fail with any config without this fix. This is for new work.
>
> Then why not submit it as part of the "new work" patch series? That's
> how dependancie
The new work series are not ready yet. I think this patch does make the
source better so here is the small patch alone.
-- Ahbong
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:29 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <
gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:18:47AM +, Ahbong Chang wrote:
> > It does n
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:18:47AM +, Ahbong Chang wrote:
> It does not fail with any config without this fix. This is for new work.
Then why not submit it as part of the "new work" patch series? That's
how dependancies are normally handled.
thanks,
greg k-h
It does not fail with any config without this fix. This is for new work.
-- Ahbong
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:24 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:36:25 +0800
> Ahbong Chang wrote:
> > Without this forward declaration compile may fail if this header is
> > included only for reg
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:36:25 +0800
Ahbong Chang wrote:
> Without this forward declaration compile may fail if this header is
> included only for registering other probe event without struct
> pool_workqueue.
>
Is this for new work or is there a config which this fails with today?
-- Steve
> S
Without this forward declaration compile may fail if this header is
included only for registering other probe event without struct
pool_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Ahbong Chang
Reviewed-by: Todd Poynor
---
include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/incl
6 matches
Mail list logo
