On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:57:01PM -0700, Chris Torek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > OK thanks, but that remains quite strange to me. How can we end up
> > here with such an unaligned stack ? At the very minimum I'd expect
> > all offsets to be multiple of 8.
>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> OK thanks, but that remains quite strange to me. How can we end up
> here with such an unaligned stack ? At the very minimum I'd expect
> all offsets to be multiple of 8.
It's a peculiar feature of the version 9 SPARC architecture and runtim
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:52:57PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-03-17 08:37:46+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 02:55:02PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Add support for 32bit and 64bit SPARC to nolibc.
> >
> > Oh nice!
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißs
On 2025-03-17 08:37:46+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 02:55:02PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Add support for 32bit and 64bit SPARC to nolibc.
>
> Oh nice!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
> > ---
> > This is only tested on QEMU.
> > Any tests on real hardware wo
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 02:55:02PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Add support for 32bit and 64bit SPARC to nolibc.
Oh nice!
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
> ---
> This is only tested on QEMU.
> Any tests on real hardware would be very welcome.
I still have a working U60 here, but under sol
Add support for 32bit and 64bit SPARC to nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
This is only tested on QEMU.
Any tests on real hardware would be very welcome.
---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-sparc.h | 191
tools/include/nolibc/arch.h |
6 matches
Mail list logo
