On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:01:51AM +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > On 11/28/2007 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual
> > > > case in
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:01:51AM +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On 11/28/2007 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual case
> > > in
> > > which shmem_getpage receives the page from its call
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 11/28/2007 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual case in
> > which shmem_getpage receives the page from its caller instead of allocating.
> > We must cover this case by clear_highpage befor
On 11/28/2007 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual case in
> which shmem_getpage receives the page from its caller instead of allocating.
> We must cover this case by clear_highpage before SetPageUptodate, as before.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual case in
> which shmem_getpage receives the page from its caller instead of allocating.
> We must cover this case by clear_highpage before SetPageUptodate, as before.
>
tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual case in
which shmem_getpage receives the page from its caller instead of allocating.
We must cover this case by clear_highpage before SetPageUptodate, as before.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Desirable in 2.6
6 matches
Mail list logo
