On 12/06/2012 06:03 AM, Dong Zhu wrote:
From c126376cf1837b0956e0268056db61870fbbc1d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dong Zhu
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept in
UTC time
If the Hardware Clock kept in local time
t;>Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0800
> >>Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept in
> >> UTC time
> >>
> >>If the Hardware Clock kept in local time,kernel will adjust the time
> >>to be UTC time.But if Har
On 12/18/2012 09:15 PM, Dong Zhu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:03:34PM +0800, Dong Zhu wrote:
From c126376cf1837b0956e0268056db61870fbbc1d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dong Zhu
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:03:34PM +0800, Dong Zhu wrote:
> From c126376cf1837b0956e0268056db61870fbbc1d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dong Zhu
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept in
> UTC time
>
>From c126376cf1837b0956e0268056db61870fbbc1d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dong Zhu
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept in
UTC time
If the Hardware Clock kept in local time,kernel will adjust the time
to be
5 matches
Mail list logo