On 02/08/2013 03:44 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 02/08/2013 06:12 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 02/08/2013 02:59 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Ok, I've got this queued in my tree. What sort of testing did you do with it?
I want to make sure we don't run into any bad interactions with the existing
15
On 02/08/2013 06:12 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 02:59 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> Ok, I've got this queued in my tree. What sort of testing did you do with it?
>
> I want to make sure we don't run into any bad interactions with the existing
> 15min cap on x86.
John,
I did the f
At init time, if the system time is "warped" forward in warp_clock()
it will differ from the hardware clock by sys_tz.tz_minuteswest. This time
difference is not taken into account when ntp updates the hardware clock,
and this causes the system time to jump forward by this offset every reboot.
Th
On 02/08/2013 02:59 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
At init time, if the system time is "warped" forward in warp_clock()
it will differ from the hardware clock by sys_tz.tz_minuteswest. This time
difference is not taken into account when ntp updates the hardware clock,
and this causes the system time
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/time/ntp.c b/kernel/time/ntp.c
> index 24174b4..e98f6b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/ntp.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c
> @@ -510,8 +510,12 @@ static void sync_cmos_clock(struct work_struct *work)
> }
>
> getns
At init time, if the system time is "warped" forward in warp_clock()
it will differ from the hardware clock by sys_tz.tz_minuteswest. This time
difference is not taken into account when ntp updates the hardware clock,
and this causes the system time to jump forward by this offset every reboot.
Th
On 02/07/2013 02:52 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 10:20 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>> On 02/07/2013 12:24 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the purpose behind the +/-15 minute window? Is it
>> just to p
On 02/07/2013 10:20 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 02/07/2013 12:24 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
We do not see this manifest on some architectures because they limit changes
to the rtc to +/-15 minutes of the current value of the rtc (x86, alpha
On 02/07/2013 12:24 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> We do not see this manifest on some architectures because they limit changes
>> to the rtc to +/-15 minutes of the current value of the rtc (x86, alpha,
>> mn10300). Other arches do nothing (c
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> The problem with this model is what happens if /etc/adjtime is LOCAL, ie)
> the rtc is set to localtime:
>
> Reboot the system, on the next boot,
> rtc0_time = rtc + sys_tz.tz_minuteswest
> Reboot the system, on the next boot,
>
I have found a long existing bug in the ntp code that causes a forwarding of
time equal to that of the local timezone every reboot. This is the sequence
indicating what happens during boot.
+ start boot
|
+ rtc read, written as UTC into xtime/system clock. This time is rtc0_time
below.
|
|
+ .
11 matches
Mail list logo