I should have labeled my message RFC. My intent was to generate some
public discussion about a problem I've hit -- not to get this particular
patch merged.
On 07/31/2014 01:30 AM, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 16:10 -0700, Matt Longnecker wrote:
Some hardware can react autonomously a
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 16:10 -0700, Matt Longnecker wrote:
> Some hardware can react autonomously at a programmed temperature.
if you have a temperature sensor, then you should have a thermal zone
device driver for it, right?
> For example, an SoC might implement a last ditch throttle or a
> hardw
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:10:40AM +0100, Matt Longnecker wrote:
> Some hardware can react autonomously at a programmed temperature.
> For example, an SoC might implement a last ditch throttle or a
> hardware thermal shutdown. The driver for such a device can
> register itself as a cooling_device w
Some hardware can react autonomously at a programmed temperature.
For example, an SoC might implement a last ditch throttle or a
hardware thermal shutdown. The driver for such a device can
register itself as a cooling_device with the thermal framework.
With this change, the thermal framework notif
4 matches
Mail list logo
