Re: [PATCH] thermal: tegra: mark PM functions __maybe_unused

2016-04-19 Thread Wei Ni
On 2016年04月19日 20:43, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:35:55AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: >> >> >> On 2016年04月18日 15:15, Thierry Reding wrote: Old Signed by an unknown key >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:19:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] thermal: tegra: mark PM functions __maybe_unused

2016-04-19 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:35:55AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > > > On 2016年04月18日 15:15, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:19:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> After the PM support has been added to this driver, we get > >> a harmless warn

Re: [PATCH] thermal: tegra: mark PM functions __maybe_unused

2016-04-18 Thread Wei Ni
On 2016年04月18日 15:15, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:19:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> After the PM support has been added to this driver, we get >> a harmless warning when that support is disabled at compile >> time: >> >> drivers/ther

Re: [PATCH] thermal: tegra: mark PM functions __maybe_unused

2016-04-18 Thread Thierry Reding
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:19:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > After the PM support has been added to this driver, we get > a harmless warning when that support is disabled at compile > time: > > drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c:641:12: error: 'soctherm_resume' defined but > not used [-Werror=u

[PATCH] thermal: tegra: mark PM functions __maybe_unused

2016-04-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
After the PM support has been added to this driver, we get a harmless warning when that support is disabled at compile time: drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c:641:12: error: 'soctherm_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] static int soctherm_resume(struct device *dev) This marks