Hi,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:55 AM Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>
> On 7/9/2020 5:09 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > In the patch ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Avoid clock setting if not needed")
> > we avoid a whole pile of clock code. As part of that, we should have
> > restored the clock at runtime resume
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:30 AM Akash Asthana wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> >
> > @@ -670,7 +674,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> > spi_geni_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - return geni_se_resources_on(&mas->se);
> > + ret = gen
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 04:39:39PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In the patch ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Avoid clock setting if not needed")
> we avoid a whole pile of clock code. As part of that, we should have
> restored the clock at runtime resume. Do that.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
signature.asc
On 7/9/2020 5:09 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
In the patch ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Avoid clock setting if not needed")
we avoid a whole pile of clock code. As part of that, we should have
restored the clock at runtime resume. Do that.
It turns out that, at least with today's configurations, thi
Hi Doug,
@@ -670,7 +674,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused spi_geni_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- return geni_se_resources_on(&mas->se);
+ ret = geni_se_resources_on(&mas->se);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ de
In the patch ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Avoid clock setting if not needed")
we avoid a whole pile of clock code. As part of that, we should have
restored the clock at runtime resume. Do that.
It turns out that, at least with today's configurations, this doesn't
actually matter. That's because none o
6 matches
Mail list logo