On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 21:37 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > you routinely send very trivial
> > patches which don't apply cleanly
> That's demonstrably false.
It's sadly not, at least for the things I get to see - as far as I have
been
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 21:37 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> you routinely send very trivial
> patches which don't apply cleanly
That's demonstrably false.
> people
> who submit many patches ought to be examples of how to work smoothly.
I'm done with this conversation.
--
To unsubscribe from this li
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:16:45PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> The commit isn't in -next so I have no idea what
> you actually applied. (nor do I really care btw)
The fact that you don't care is kind of the problem here, aside from
the extra effort involved the active resistance to change isn't g
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > That one needs a bit more taste and thought to work out what's
> > > appropraite than can be guaranteed easily with a
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That one needs a bit more taste and thought to work out what's
> > appropraite than can be guaranteed easily with a script, things like
> > working out drive level prefixes for e
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:16:15AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 17:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I don't think you're quite understanding the issues with automation
> > > here. Or indeed the desired end result.
>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:16:15AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 17:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I don't think you're quite understanding the issues with automation
> > here. Or indeed the desired end result.
> What issue is that?
That one needs a bit more taste and thoug
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 17:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I suggest you use a git pre-commit hook to your
> > tree and use sed/perl to add a specific prefix
> > if it doesn't exist.
> > http://codeinthehole.com/writing/tips-for-using-a-git-pre-commit-hook/
>
> I don't think you're quite understandi
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:22:16AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:57 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I've applied this but I'm fed up to the back teeth of having to hand
> > > edit trivial patches from you because you
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:57 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:58:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Source files shouldn't have the executable bit set.
>
> I've applied this but I'm fed up to the back teeth of having to hand
> edit trivial patches from you because you ignore th
Source files shouldn't have the executable bit set.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
include/sound/max98090.h| 0
sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c | 0
sound/soc/codecs/max98090.h | 0
3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sound/max98090.h b/include/sound/max98090.h
11 matches
Mail list logo
