* Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
>
> >It's an rlimit, so easily setable in userspace at login session time. I
> >think we could raise it if people start complaining it's too low (hasn't
> >seemed to be a problem yet).
> >
> Know any shells which support setti
Chris Wright wrote:
>It's an rlimit, so easily setable in userspace at login session time. I
>think we could raise it if people start complaining it's too low (hasn't
>seemed to be a problem yet).
>
Know any shells which support setting it? Indeed, glibc doesn't seem to
know about it.
J
-
T
* Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> While looking into the issues Jeremy had with the RLIMIT_SIGPENDING limit,
> it occurred to me that the normal setting of this limit is bizarrely low.
> The initial hard limit setting (MAX_SIGPENDING) was taken from the old
> max_queued_signals paramete
While looking into the issues Jeremy had with the RLIMIT_SIGPENDING limit,
it occurred to me that the normal setting of this limit is bizarrely low.
The initial hard limit setting (MAX_SIGPENDING) was taken from the old
max_queued_signals parameter, which was for the entire system in aggregate.
But
4 matches
Mail list logo
