el@vger.kernel.org; Joseph Lo
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: of-serial: fix up PM ops on
>no_console_suspend
>
>Hi Jingchang,
>
>On 10/09/2014 05:10 AM, Jingchang Lu wrote:
>> Mandatorily disabling the uart clock will cause register access hung
>> on "no_console_su
Hi Jingchang,
On 10/09/2014 05:10 AM, Jingchang Lu wrote:
> Mandatorily disabling the uart clock will cause register access
> hung on "no_console_suspend". This patch add condition check on
> it and only disable the clock with console_suspend_enabled true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo
> Signed-o
On 10/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingchang Lu wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org]
>> On 10/09/2014 02:10 AM, Jingchang Lu wrote:
>>> Mandatorily disabling the uart clock will cause register access hung
>>> on "no_console_suspend". This patch add condition check on it and only
>>> d
org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: of-serial: fix up PM ops on
>no_console_suspend
>
>On 10/09/2014 02:10 AM, Jingchang Lu wrote:
>> Mandatorily disabling the uart clock will cause register access hung
>> on "no_console_suspend". This patch add
On 10/09/2014 02:10 AM, Jingchang Lu wrote:
> Mandatorily disabling the uart clock will cause register access
> hung on "no_console_suspend". This patch add condition check on
> it and only disable the clock with console_suspend_enabled true.
It would be useful if the email/patch subject line said
Mandatorily disabling the uart clock will cause register access
hung on "no_console_suspend". This patch add condition check on
it and only disable the clock with console_suspend_enabled true.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo
Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu
---
drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c | 4 ++--
1 fi
6 matches
Mail list logo