On 04/01/16 20:30, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000
Greg Ungerer wrote:
If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the
architecture support for 68328 platforms?
The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console
that can be used on these de
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000
Greg Ungerer wrote:
> If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the
> architecture support for 68328 platforms?
>
> The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console
> that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless
> witho
If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the
architecture support for 68328 platforms?
The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console
that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless
without this.
Regards
Greg
On 19/12/15 00:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrot
CC linux-m68k, uClinux-dev
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Frederik Völkel
wrote:
> It's old, messy and mostly unmaintained.
> Remove it as suggested by Peter Hurley and Alan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederik Völkel
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Braun
> ---
> Should we remove other drivers like framebuff
It's old, messy and mostly unmaintained.
Remove it as suggested by Peter Hurley and Alan.
Signed-off-by: Frederik Völkel
Signed-off-by: Lukas Braun
---
Should we remove other drivers like framebuffer as well?
It is probably useless without serial support.
---
drivers/tty/serial/68328serial.c |
5 matches
Mail list logo