Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: make stackprotector probing more robust

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:39:16AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > nolibc only supports symbol-based stackprotectors, based on the global > variable __stack_chk_guard. Support for this differs between > architectures and toolchains. Some use the symbol mode by default, some > require a flag to ena

Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: make stackprotector probing more robust

Hi Thomas, On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:39:16AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > nolibc only supports symbol-based stackprotectors, based on the global > variable __stack_chk_guard. Support for this differs between > architectures and toolchains. Some use the symbol mode by default, some > require a

[PATCH] selftests/nolibc: make stackprotector probing more robust

nolibc only supports symbol-based stackprotectors, based on the global variable __stack_chk_guard. Support for this differs between architectures and toolchains. Some use the symbol mode by default, some require a flag to enable it and some don't support it at all. Before the nolibc test Makefile