On 03/13/2015 03:34 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:43:19PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Hi Andrey,
>>
>> Looks good in general. Couple of comments.
>
> Thanks. The updated version is attached.
Please send a properly marked patch v2. Please don't
send patches as attachments.
> > + if (strncmp(p, "lock:", 5))
> > + continue;
> > + ret = sscanf(p, "lock:\t%d:%s %s %s %d %x:%x:%ld %lld %s",
> > + &fl_id, fl_flag, fl_type, fl_option,
> > +
Hi Andrey,
Looks good in general. Couple of comments.
On 03/12/2015 10:30 AM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> The main idea of this test is to check that locks are shown correctly
> when they can't be placed in a default seq_file buffer due to its size.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton
> Cc: Shuah Khan
> Signed-of
The main idea of this test is to check that locks are shown correctly
when they can't be placed in a default seq_file buffer due to its size.
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Shuah Khan
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin
---
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile| 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/fdinfo/Makefil
4 matches
Mail list logo
