Hi Martin,
On 09/26/2017 01:01 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Alim,
>
>> Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT()
>> macro?
>
> I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes.
>
> Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes.
>
Thanks for looking into this patc
Alim,
> Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT()
> macro?
I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes.
Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Hi,
Ping!!!
Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() macro?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Bart,
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On 08/28/2017 09:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> This
Hi Bart,
Thanks for your review.
On 08/28/2017 09:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few
>> places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned
>> with
On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few
> places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned
> with reset of the file.
This is the definition of the UFS_BIT() macro I found in
drivers/s
This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few
places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned
with reset of the file.
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -
6 matches
Mail list logo