On 03/29/2016 09:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> No problem. At least we now know another frequent user.
Let's say sometimes :)
> BTW, Kieran and some other people at Linaro started to think about how
> to auto-test for such regressions - probably the only reliable way to
> catch them.
Good idea. I a
On 2016-03-29 09:13, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 08:59 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2016-03-29 08:41, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> for module in module_list():
>>> gdb.write("{address} {name:<19} {size:>8} {ref}".format(
>>> -address=str(module['module_cor
On 03/29/2016 08:59 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-03-29 08:41, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> for module in module_list():
>> gdb.write("{address} {name:<19} {size:>8} {ref}".format(
>> -address=str(module['module_core']).split()[0],
>> +module_layo
On 2016-03-29 08:41, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> From: Daniel Wagner
>
> The module_core symbols is not available due to
>
> 7523e4dc5057 ("module: use a structure to encapsulate layout.")
>
> The base address of the module is now stored inside
> struct module_layout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagn
From: Daniel Wagner
The module_core symbols is not available due to
7523e4dc5057 ("module: use a structure to encapsulate layout.")
The base address of the module is now stored inside
struct module_layout.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner
Cc: Jiri Kosina
Cc: Rusty Russell
---
scripts/gdb/linux
5 matches
Mail list logo