Re: [PATCH] sched: Reduce overhead in balance_tasks()

Ingo Molnar wrote: * Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At the moment, balance_tasks() provides low level functionality for both move_tasks() and move_one_task() (indirectly) via the load_balance() function (in the sched_class interface) which also provides dual functionality. This d

Re: [PATCH] sched: Reduce overhead in balance_tasks()

* Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the moment, balance_tasks() provides low level functionality for > both > move_tasks() and move_one_task() (indirectly) via the load_balance() > function (in the sched_class interface) which also provides dual > functionality. This dual functi

[PATCH] sched: Reduce overhead in balance_tasks()

At the moment, balance_tasks() provides low level functionality for both move_tasks() and move_one_task() (indirectly) via the load_balance() function (in the sched_class interface) which also provides dual functionality. This dual functionality complicates the interfaces and internal mechani