On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:08:21PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> John identified three files which claim that RT task priorities start at
> zero. As far as I understand, 0 is used for DL and has nothing to do
> wihich RT priorities as identified by the RT policy.
>
> Correct the commen
On 2019-04-03, John Ogness wrote:
> IMHO it is a bit crazy that userspace RT prio 99 maps to kernel prio
> 0. This leaves a hole at kernel prio 99. Wouldn't it be better just to
> map userspace RT prio 1-99 to kernel prio 99-1?
FWIW, the current mapping:
userspace kernel
On 2019-04-03, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> John identified three files which claim that RT task priorities start at
> zero. As far as I understand, 0 is used for DL and has nothing to do
> wihich RT priorities as identified by the RT policy.
>
> Correct the comment, valid RT priorities are
John identified three files which claim that RT task priorities start at
zero. As far as I understand, 0 is used for DL and has nothing to do
wihich RT priorities as identified by the RT policy.
Correct the comment, valid RT priorities are in the range from 1 to 99.
Reported-by: John Ogness
Sign
4 matches
Mail list logo
