Re: [PATCH] sched: Do not zero sg->cpumask and sg->sgp->power in build_sched_groups

2014-05-13 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 30/04/14 14:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > > From: Dietmar Eggemann > > > > There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct > > sched_group_power member power since both structures are alrea

Re: [PATCH] sched: Do not zero sg->cpumask and sg->sgp->power in build_sched_groups

2014-05-13 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
Hi Peter, On 30/04/14 14:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > From: Dietmar Eggemann > > There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct > sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated > as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc(). > > This patch has been teste

Re: [PATCH] sched: Do not zero sg->cpumask and sg->sgp->power in build_sched_groups

2014-04-30 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
On 30/04/14 14:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > From: Dietmar Eggemann > > There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct > sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated > as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc(). > > This patch has been tested with > BU

[PATCH] sched: Do not zero sg->cpumask and sg->sgp->power in build_sched_groups

2014-04-30 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
From: Dietmar Eggemann There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc(). This patch has been tested with BUG_ON(!cpumask_empty(sched_group_cpus(sg))); and BUG_ON(sg->