Hi,
> On Aug 12, 2020, at 12:55 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
> wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2020 10:43, Jiang Biao wrote:
>> Similar optimization as what has been done in commit,
>> 7d148be69e3a(sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair())
>>
>> dequeue_task_fair jumps to dequeue_throttle label when cfs_rq_of(se)
On 11/08/2020 10:43, Jiang Biao wrote:
> Similar optimization as what has been done in commit,
> 7d148be69e3a(sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair())
>
> dequeue_task_fair jumps to dequeue_throttle label when cfs_rq_of(se) is
> throttled which means that se can't be NULL. We can move the label a
Similar optimization as what has been done in commit,
7d148be69e3a(sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair())
dequeue_task_fair jumps to dequeue_throttle label when cfs_rq_of(se) is
throttled which means that se can't be NULL. We can move the label after
the if (!se) statement and remove the if(!se
On 6/15/20 11:09 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 16:20, Peng Wang wrote:
While looking at enqueue_task_fair and dequeue_task_fair, it occurred
to me that dequeue_task_fair can also be optimized as Vincent described
in commit 7d148be69e3a ("sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fa
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 16:20, Peng Wang wrote:
>
> While looking at enqueue_task_fair and dequeue_task_fair, it occurred
> to me that dequeue_task_fair can also be optimized as Vincent described
> in commit 7d148be69e3a ("sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair()").
good point
>
> dequeue_throttl
While looking at enqueue_task_fair and dequeue_task_fair, it occurred
to me that dequeue_task_fair can also be optimized as Vincent described
in commit 7d148be69e3a ("sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair()").
dequeue_throttle label can ensure se not to be NULL, and se is
always NULL when reachin
6 matches
Mail list logo