Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-22 Thread Xunlei Pang
On 06/22/2017 at 01:44 AM, Michael Holzheu wrote: > Am Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:17:05 +0800 > schrieb Xunlei Pang : > >> S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which >> is now defined as follows: >> typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; >> It was changed by the CONFIG_

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-21 Thread Michael Holzheu
Am Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:17:05 +0800 schrieb Xunlei Pang : > S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which > is now defined as follows: > typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; > It was changed by the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE feature. > > This patch gets rid of all the old

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-21 Thread Michael Holzheu
Hi Xunlei, Sorry for the late reply - I was on vacation up to now. Give us some time to look into this issue. Michael Am Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:17:05 +0800 schrieb Xunlei Pang : > S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which > is now defined as follows: > typedef u32 note_b

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-11 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Xunlei, [auto build test ERROR on next-20170605] [also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4] [cannot apply to linus/master linux/master s390/features v4.9-rc8 v4.9-rc7 v4.9-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://githu

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-11 Thread Xunlei Pang
On 06/09/2017 at 03:45 PM, Dave Young wrote: > On 06/09/17 at 10:29am, Dave Young wrote: >> On 06/09/17 at 10:17am, Xunlei Pang wrote: >>> S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which >>> is now defined as follows: >>> typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; >>> It

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-09 Thread Dave Young
On 06/09/17 at 10:29am, Dave Young wrote: > On 06/09/17 at 10:17am, Xunlei Pang wrote: > > S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which > > is now defined as follows: > > typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; > > It was changed by the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE feature. >

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-08 Thread Hari Bathini
On Friday 09 June 2017 07:47 AM, Xunlei Pang wrote: S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which is now defined as follows: typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; It was changed by the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE feature. This patch gets rid of all the old KEXEC_NOTE_B

Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-08 Thread Dave Young
On 06/09/17 at 10:17am, Xunlei Pang wrote: > S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which > is now defined as follows: > typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; > It was changed by the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE feature. > > This patch gets rid of all the old KEXEC_NOTE_BYT

[PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition

2017-06-08 Thread Xunlei Pang
S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which is now defined as follows: typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4]; It was changed by the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE feature. This patch gets rid of all the old KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES stuff, and renames KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES to CRASH_CORE_NO