Hi Alexandre,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:15 PM Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
>
> On 14/08/2020 16:10:13+1000, Victor Ding wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:33 PM Alexandre Belloni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 13/08/2020 15:41:34+1000, Victor Ding wrote:
> > > > cm
On 14/08/2020 16:10:13+1000, Victor Ding wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:33 PM Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 13/08/2020 15:41:34+1000, Victor Ding wrote:
> > > cmos_read_alarm() may leave certain fields of a struct rtc_time
> > > untouched; therefore, thes
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:33 PM Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 13/08/2020 15:41:34+1000, Victor Ding wrote:
> > cmos_read_alarm() may leave certain fields of a struct rtc_time
> > untouched; therefore, these fields contain garbage if not properly
> > initialized, leading to
Hi,
On 13/08/2020 15:41:34+1000, Victor Ding wrote:
> cmos_read_alarm() may leave certain fields of a struct rtc_time
> untouched; therefore, these fields contain garbage if not properly
> initialized, leading to inconsistent values when converting into
> time64_t.
> This patch to set all fields o
cmos_read_alarm() may leave certain fields of a struct rtc_time
untouched; therefore, these fields contain garbage if not properly
initialized, leading to inconsistent values when converting into
time64_t.
This patch to set all fields of a struct rtc_time to -1 before calling
cmos_read_alarm().
Si
5 matches
Mail list logo