On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> Adding the aligned(1024) attribute to the definition of __rseq_abi did
> not increase its size to 1024, for this attribute to impact the size of
> __rseq_abi it would need to be added to the declaration of 'struct
> rseq_abi'. We o
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:50:58AM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> On 2025-03-18 10:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> >
> > > Adding the aligned(1024) attribute to the definition of __rseq_abi did
> > > not increase its size to 1024, for t
On 2025-03-18 10:01, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
Adding the aligned(1024) attribute to the definition of __rseq_abi did
not increase its size to 1024, for this attribute to impact the size of
__rseq_abi it would need to be added to the decl
Adding the aligned(1024) attribute to the definition of __rseq_abi did
not increase its size to 1024, for this attribute to impact the size of
__rseq_abi it would need to be added to the declaration of 'struct
rseq_abi'. We only want to increase the size of the TLS allocation to
ensure registration
4 matches
Mail list logo