Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO

2017-06-27 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Bjorn, Thanks for the patch. >> >> On 06/27/2017 01:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware >>> running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG. >> >> This is not entirely accurate though. RPMSG is the IP

Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO

2017-06-27 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Tue 27 Jun 12:08 PDT 2017, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > Thanks for the patch. > > On 06/27/2017 01:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware > > running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG. > > This

Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO

2017-06-27 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Bjorn, Thanks for the patch. On 06/27/2017 01:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware > running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG. This is not entirely accurate though. RPMSG is the IPC transport on thes

Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO

2017-06-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware > running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG. > As such RPMSG should be selected by the system integrator and not > automatically by the remote

[PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO

2017-06-26 Thread Bjorn Andersson
While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG. As such RPMSG should be selected by the system integrator and not automatically by the remoteproc drivers. This does solve problems reported with circular Kc