Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: mark racy accesses on work->wait_index

On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:55:34 +0800 linke li wrote: > Mark data races to work->wait_index as benign using READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE. > These accesses are expected to be racy. Are we now to the point that every single access of a variable (long size or less) needs a READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE even with

[PATCH] ring-buffer: mark racy accesses on work->wait_index

Mark data races to work->wait_index as benign using READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE. These accesses are expected to be racy. Signed-off-by: linke li --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buf