Re: [PATCH] resolve duplicate flag no for PG_lazyfree

2007-05-15 Thread Nick Piggin
Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400 Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to act

Re: [PATCH] resolve duplicate flag no for PG_lazyfree

2007-05-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400 Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which > > are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise >

Re: [PATCH] resolve duplicate flag no for PG_lazyfree

2007-05-14 Thread Theodore Tso
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which > are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise > this reuse within the ext4 patches. > > otoh2, PageLazyFree() could have reused

Re: [PATCH] resolve duplicate flag no for PG_lazyfree

2007-05-14 Thread Fengguang Wu
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:18 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit. > > > > Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or > > the situation should be expli

Re: [PATCH] resolve duplicate flag no for PG_lazyfree

2007-05-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:18 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit. > > Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or > the situation should be explicitly documented? > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --

[PATCH] resolve duplicate flag no for PG_lazyfree

2007-05-13 Thread Fengguang Wu
PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit. Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or the situation should be explicitly documented? Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/page-flags.h |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --