Re: [PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Christian König
Am 21.11.2017 um 16:58 schrieb Chris Wilson: Quoting Christian König (2017-11-21 15:49:55) Am 21.11.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Rob Clark: On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Rob Clark (2017-11-21 14:08:46) If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been signa

Re: [PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Christian König (2017-11-21 15:49:55) > Am 21.11.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Rob Clark: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Chris Wilson > > wrote: > >> Quoting Rob Clark (2017-11-21 14:08:46) > >>> If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been > >>> signaled with timeout=0 (non

Re: [PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Christian König
Am 21.11.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Rob Clark: On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Rob Clark (2017-11-21 14:08:46) If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been signaled with timeout=0 (non-blocking), we need to pass 0 for timeout to dma_fence_wait_timeout().

Re: [PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Rob Clark (2017-11-21 14:08:46) >> If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been >> signaled with timeout=0 (non-blocking), we need to pass 0 for >> timeout to dma_fence_wait_timeout(). >> >> Plus bonus spelling correcti

Re: [PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Rob Clark (2017-11-21 14:08:46) > If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been > signaled with timeout=0 (non-blocking), we need to pass 0 for > timeout to dma_fence_wait_timeout(). > > Plus bonus spelling correction. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > --- > drivers/dma-buf/

Re: [PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Christian König
Am 21.11.2017 um 15:08 schrieb Rob Clark: If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been signaled with timeout=0 (non-blocking), we need to pass 0 for timeout to dma_fence_wait_timeout(). Plus bonus spelling correction. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark Reviewed-by: Christian König -

[PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

2017-11-21 Thread Rob Clark
If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been signaled with timeout=0 (non-blocking), we need to pass 0 for timeout to dma_fence_wait_timeout(). Plus bonus spelling correction. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertio