Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-03-01 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig writes: >> >>> Urgg. limits.h is a userlevel header... >>> >>> The attached patch will make similar atempts fail (but not this one as >>> there is also a limits.h in gcc's include di

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-03-01 Thread Alexander Zarochentcev
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 01:39:46AM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:21:30PM +0300, Alexander Zarochentcev wrote: > > 6. Using integer constants from limits.h instead of self made ones > > That's a userland header file. Don't use it in the kernel. > > > 7. other minor fixes. >

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-03-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Christoph Hellwig writes: > > > Urgg. limits.h is a userlevel header... > > > > The attached patch will make similar atempts fail (but not this one as > > there is also a limits.h in gcc's include dir). > > There are very few

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-02-28 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Christoph Hellwig writes: > Urgg. limits.h is a userlevel header... > > The attached patch will make similar atempts fail (but not this one as > there is also a limits.h in gcc's include dir). There are very few files needed from gcc's include dir. Linux ought to be able to survive without them

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-02-28 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:27:33 +0100, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Urgg. limits.h is a userlevel header... > >The attached patch will make similar atempts fail (but not this one as >there is also a limits.h in gcc's include dir). > >--- linux-2.4.0/Makefile Mon Dec 25 19:21:1

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-02-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 11:01:59AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:27:33 +0100, > Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Urgg. limits.h is a userlevel header... > > > >The attached patch will make similar atempts fail (but not this one as > >there is also a limits.h in

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-02-28 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:21:30PM +0300, Alexander Zarochentcev wrote: > 6. Using integer constants from limits.h instead of self made ones That's a userland header file. Don't use it in the kernel. > 7. other minor fixes. Does this patch contain Chris Mason's "tail conversion" fix that he mad

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-02-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:21:30PM +0300, Alexander Zarochentcev wrote: > 6. Using integer constants from limits.h instead of self made ones Urgg. limits.h is a userlevel header... The attached patch will make similar atempts fail (but not this one as there is also a limits.h in gcc's include di

[PATCH] reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2

2001-02-28 Thread Alexander Zarochentcev
Hello ! This reiserfs patch for linux-2.4.2 was prepared by all members of the reiserfs dev team. It contains the following fixes/cleanups/improvements: 1. Fix for possible preallocated blocks leakage after a system crash Reiserfs does block preallocation for big files like ext2 does. Preall