On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:24:12AM +0200, Davide Ciminaghi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 03:26:09PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:31:04PM +0200, cimina...@gnudd.com wrote:
> > > + struct regmap *map = (struct regmap *)__map;
> > > mutex_lock(&map->mutex);
> > ...you
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 03:26:09PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:31:04PM +0200, cimina...@gnudd.com wrote:
> > From: Davide Ciminaghi
> >
> > It is sometimes convenient for a regmap user to override the standard
> > regmap lock/unlock functions with custom functions.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:31:04PM +0200, cimina...@gnudd.com wrote:
> From: Davide Ciminaghi
>
> It is sometimes convenient for a regmap user to override the standard
> regmap lock/unlock functions with custom functions.
This looks good overall but...
> -static void regmap_lock_mutex(struct re
From: Davide Ciminaghi
It is sometimes convenient for a regmap user to override the standard
regmap lock/unlock functions with custom functions.
For instance this can be useful in case an already existing spinlock
or mutex has to be used for locking a set of registers instead of the
internal regm
4 matches
Mail list logo