Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove some superfluous lines

2016-04-12 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:55:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:41:46AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > I think you'll find this condition is superfluous, as the whole function > > > is unde

Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove some superfluous lines

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:41:46AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > I think you'll find this condition is superfluous, as the whole function > > is under #ifdef of that same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) >

Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove some superfluous lines

2016-03-10 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I think you'll find this condition is superfluous, as the whole function > is under #ifdef of that same. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Right you are! It got moved under that #ifdef in the process of merging the RCU

[PATCH] rcu: Remove some superfluous lines

2016-03-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
I think you'll find this condition is superfluous, as the whole function is under #ifdef of that same. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 4f7369d54de0..dd2646e56456 100644