Hello,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:34:56PM +0800, Dennis Chen wrote:
> >I don't think sysfs is supposed to handle multiple actors trying to
> >populate and destroy the directory at the same time at all, so this
> >seems kinda moot. Do you have a case where this actually matters?
>
> hello,Tejun. N
On 07/26/2013 09:38 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:59:00PM +0800, Dennis Chen wrote:
On 07/26/2013 05:49 PM, Dennis Chen wrote:
The patch is trying its best to avoid creating a dir under a parent dir which
is removing from
the system:
PATH0 (create a dir under 'P
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:38:56AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I don't think sysfs is supposed to handle multiple actors trying to
> populate and destroy the directory at the same time at all, so this
e.g. kobj->sd assignment in sysfs_create_dir() isn't synchronized and
doesn't have memory barrier e
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:59:00PM +0800, Dennis Chen wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 05:49 PM, Dennis Chen wrote:
>
> >The patch is trying its best to avoid creating a dir under a parent dir
> >which is removing from
> >the system:
> > PATH0 (create a dir under 'PARENT/...') PATH1 (re
On 07/26/2013 05:49 PM, Dennis Chen wrote:
The patch is trying its best to avoid creating a dir under a parent dir which
is removing from
the system:
PATH0 (create a dir under 'PARENT/...') PATH1 (remove the
'PARENT/...')
sysfs_create_dir() { sysf
The patch is trying its best to avoid creating a dir under a parent dir which
is removing from
the system:
PATH0 (create a dir under 'PARENT/...') PATH1 (remove the
'PARENT/...')
sysfs_create_dir() { sysfs_remove_dir() {
...
6 matches
Mail list logo