Re: [PATCH] pwm-regulator: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes

2016-08-26 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Matthias, On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > A change of the duty cycle doesn't necessarily cause an inmediate switch > to the target voltage. The voltage change may be gradual and complete > with a certain delay. This change introduces the device tree properties >

Re: [PATCH] pwm-regulator: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes

2016-08-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Matthias, [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next] [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc3 next-20160825] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for convenience) to rec

Re: [PATCH] pwm-regulator: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes

2016-08-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Matthias, [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next] [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc3 next-20160825] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for convenience) to rec

[PATCH] pwm-regulator: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes

2016-08-26 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
A change of the duty cycle doesn't necessarily cause an inmediate switch to the target voltage. The voltage change may be gradual and complete with a certain delay. This change introduces the device tree properties "settle-time-up-us" and "settle-time-down-us", which allow to specify a fixed delay