Re: [PATCH] pwm: imx-pwm: add explicit compatible strings and required clock properties

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:16:44AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Matt Porter wrote: >> > The imx-pwm binding contains language indicating compatible >> > strings to be used that is not valid for all supported par

Re: [PATCH] pwm: imx-pwm: add explicit compatible strings and required clock properties

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:16:44AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > The imx-pwm binding contains language indicating compatible > > strings to be used that is not valid for all supported parts > > e.g. Should be "fsl,-pwm". Fix this by enumerating

Re: [PATCH] pwm: imx-pwm: add explicit compatible strings and required clock properties

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > The imx-pwm binding contains language indicating compatible > strings to be used that is not valid for all supported parts > e.g. Should be "fsl,-pwm". Fix this by enumerating the > valid compatible strings that represent the two versions of > t

[PATCH] pwm: imx-pwm: add explicit compatible strings and required clock properties

The imx-pwm binding contains language indicating compatible strings to be used that is not valid for all supported parts e.g. Should be "fsl,-pwm". Fix this by enumerating the valid compatible strings that represent the two versions of this peripheral in use. The binding is also missing the clocks