Hi Thierry,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:
Please Cc the linux-...@vger.kernel.org mailing list for PWM-related
patches in the future.
ok, I ran get_maintainer.pl on an old kernel...
Also a couple more comments:
In the patch description: "pwm frequency" should be "PWM frequency"
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:47:34AM +0200, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
> >>- }
> >>+ div >>= 1;
> >>+ ++pres;
> >
> >Unless you really need the prefix increment behaviour (you don't in this
> >case) I prefer using the postfix
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> The prescale value used for calculating the period was incremented
> afterwards, thus the resulting prescale value is by one too high.
> This resulted in a pwm frequency only half as high as requested.
>
> This patch moves the 64 bit
Hi,
Correct the PWM maintainer Thierry Reding's e-mail address.
and Add linux-arm-kernel ML.
On 09/25/2014 09:50 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Nikolaus Voss,
On 09/23/2014 09:30 PM, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
The prescale value used for calculating the period was incremented
afterwards, thus the resulting
Hi Nikolaus Voss,
On 09/23/2014 09:30 PM, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
The prescale value used for calculating the period was incremented
afterwards, thus the resulting prescale value is by one too high.
This resulted in a pwm frequency only half as high as requested.
This patch moves the 64 bit divisi
The prescale value used for calculating the period was incremented
afterwards, thus the resulting prescale value is by one too high.
This resulted in a pwm frequency only half as high as requested.
This patch moves the 64 bit division out of the prescale loop to
correct the above issue and make th
6 matches
Mail list logo
