On 05/13/2014 11:39 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/05/14 05:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 05/01/2014 07:43 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 04/28/2014 12:00 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
The current documentation is bit misleading and does not explicitly
specify that iov.len need to be i
On 05/05/14 05:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 07:43 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 04/28/2014 12:00 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> The current documentation is bit misleading and does not explicitly
>>> specify that iov.len need to be initialized failing which kernel
>>> may just igno
On 05/01/2014 07:43 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 12:00 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> The current documentation is bit misleading and does not explicitly
>> specify that iov.len need to be initialized failing which kernel
>> may just ignore the ptrace request and never read from/write in
On 04/28/2014 12:00 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> The current documentation is bit misleading and does not explicitly
> specify that iov.len need to be initialized failing which kernel
> may just ignore the ptrace request and never read from/write into
> the user specified buffer. This patch fixes
The current documentation is bit misleading and does not explicitly
specify that iov.len need to be initialized failing which kernel
may just ignore the ptrace request and never read from/write into
the user specified buffer. This patch fixes the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
--
5 matches
Mail list logo
