On Wednesday 16 February 2005 10:35, Al Viro wrote:
> Most of the mess is in drivers/*, arch/* and (for endianness patches) net/*...
Yes, net/*. Many do X.s_addr = htonl(blah). Is this correct?
--- a/include/linux/in.h
+++ b/include/linux/in.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ enum {
/* Internet address. */
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 07:26:18PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> Umm... Let's do it that way: I'll get carving the sucker up to relatively
> sane point and post it again (-bird, that is). Give me until tomorrow
> morning and then feel free to send stuff my way - I'll merge it and feed
> upstream when 2
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 03:12:37PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 13:59, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > Let's hold this kind of stuff until 2.6.11, OK?
> >
> > Al, sitting on more than a megabyte of such
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 13:59, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> Let's hold this kind of stuff until 2.6.11, OK?
>
> Al, sitting on more than a megabyte of such patches...
Could you send diffstat or something? I did "make allyesconfig
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
[snip]
Let's hold this kind of stuff until 2.6.11, OK?
Al, sitting on more than a megabyte of such patches...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-warnings/fs/proc/base.c
===
--- linux-warnings/fs/proc/base.c (revision 25)
+++ linux-warnings/fs/proc/base.c (revision 29)
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@
.open
6 matches
Mail list logo
