Sent: 2012年9月19日 13:58
To: Feng Hong
Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; gorcu...@openvz.org; keesc...@chromium.org;
serge.hal...@canonical.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] poweroff: fix bug in orderly_poweroff
Feng Hong writes:
> Hi, Eric
>
> 1. We are developing on an
Feng Hong writes:
> Hi, Eric
>
> 1. We are developing on an Android phone platform, we use thermal
> framework to monitor the temperature, when the temperature above like
> 110 degree, thermal framework will use orderly_shutdown to shutdown
> phone, however, on Android platform there is no " /sbi
i) Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:ebied...@xmission.com]
Sent: 2012年9月19日 12:47
To: Feng Hong
Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; gorcu...@openvz.org; keesc...@chromium.org;
serge.hal...@canonical.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] poweroff: fi
hongfeng writes:
> orderly_poweroff is trying to poweroff platform by two steps:
> step 1: Call userspace application to poweroff
> step 2: If userspace poweroff fail, then do a force power off if force param
> is set.
>
> The bug here is, step 1 is always successful with param UMH_NO_WAIT,
Thi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:27 PM, hongfeng wrote:
> orderly_poweroff is trying to poweroff platform by two steps:
> step 1: Call userspace application to poweroff
> step 2: If userspace poweroff fail, then do a force power off if force param
> is set.
>
> The bug here is, step 1 is always successf
orderly_poweroff is trying to poweroff platform by two steps:
step 1: Call userspace application to poweroff
step 2: If userspace poweroff fail, then do a force power off if force param is
set.
The bug here is, step 1 is always successful with param UMH_NO_WAIT,
should change to UMH_WAIT_PROC whi
6 matches
Mail list logo
