Re: [PATCH] power: Replace printks with pr_* routines

2013-11-15 Thread Shuah Khan
On 11/15/2013 03:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:46:21PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 06:19 +0900, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: Replaced printks with pr_* routines. dev_* routines could have been used, but chose

Re: [PATCH] power: Replace printks with pr_* routines

2013-11-15 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:46:21PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 06:19 +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > Replaced printks with pr_* routines. dev_* routines could have been used, > > > but chose to use pr_* to avoid break

Re: [PATCH] power: Replace printks with pr_* routines

2013-11-15 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 06:19 +0900, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > Replaced printks with pr_* routines. dev_* routines could have been used, > > but chose to use pr_* to avoid breaking scripts that might be relying on > > a specific text. > > I'd re

Re: [PATCH] power: Replace printks with pr_* routines

2013-11-15 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > Replaced printks with pr_* routines. dev_* routines could have been used, > but chose to use pr_* to avoid breaking scripts that might be relying on > a specific text. I'd really like to switch to dev_* instead, even changing to pr_* sh

[PATCH] power: Replace printks with pr_* routines

2013-11-15 Thread Shuah Khan
Replaced printks with pr_* routines. dev_* routines could have been used, but chose to use pr_* to avoid breaking scripts that might be relying on a specific text. Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/dr