On 6/30/2022 11:04 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:51:55AM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
>> -static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
>> +static phys_addr_t _to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
>
> I'd rather call this pmem_to_ph
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:51:55AM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> -static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
> +static phys_addr_t _to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
I'd rather call this pmem_to_phys as that is a much nicer name.
Kernel test robot detected name collision when compiled on 'um'
architecture. Rename "to_phys()" to "_to_phys()".
>> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c:48:20: error: conflicting types for 'to_phys'; have
>> 'phys_addr_t(struct pmem_device *, phys_addr_t)' {aka 'long long unsigned
>> int(struct pmem_device
3 matches
Mail list logo
