Re: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:05:02AM +, Li, Fei wrote: > > > Print more info when platform device suspend function failed. > > > Without this patch, we can not get the real platform device suspend > > > API info. > > > > > > Example without this patch: > > > pm_op(): platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x50

RE: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-18 Thread Li, Fei
> > Print more info when platform device suspend function failed. > > Without this patch, we can not get the real platform device suspend > > API info. > > > > Example without this patch: > > pm_op(): platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x50 returns -11 > > PM: Device power.0 failed to suspend: error -11 > > >

Re: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 01:58:23PM +0800, Li Fei wrote: > > Print more info when platform device suspend function failed. > Without this patch, we can not get the real platform device suspend > API info. > > Example without this patch: > pm_op(): platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x50 returns -11 > PM: Dev

[PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-17 Thread Li Fei
Print more info when platform device suspend function failed. Without this patch, we can not get the real platform device suspend API info. Example without this patch: pm_op(): platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x50 returns -11 PM: Device power.0 failed to suspend: error -11 And with this patch: platform_

Re: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-15 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 01:22:31AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote: > Hello Greg, > > Double checked, there is no your response before. > Can you consider it again? Thanks. Consider what? I get about 2

RE: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-15 Thread Liu, Chuansheng
ay, March 16, 2013 3:20 AM > To: Liu, Chuansheng > Cc: Li, Fei; r...@sisk.pl; a...@linux-foundation.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ldewan...@nvidia.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for > platform > device > > On Mon, Mar

Re: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-15 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:41:28AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I just noticed some other cases need the more log also. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/8/71 > > Could you consider the below patch, thanks? Didn't I already consider it and respond? -- To unsubscribe from this list:

RE: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-03-10 Thread Liu, Chuansheng
ation.org; r...@sisk.pl; a...@linux-foundation.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Liu, Chuansheng; Li, Fei > Subject: [PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform > device > > > Print more info when platform device suspend function failed. > Witho

[PATCH] pm: print the name of failed suspend function for platform device

2013-02-04 Thread fli24
Print more info when platform device suspend function failed. Without this patch, we can not get the real platform device suspend API info. Example without this patch: pm_op(): platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x50 returns -11 PM: Device power.0 failed to suspend: error -11 And with this patch: platform_