On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 21:20 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Hein Tibosch wrote:
> > Hi Andy, Mika,
> >
> > On 8 Feb 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> Some of the platform devices rely on the name of their driver to match
> >> with. In
> >> the current implementatio
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Hein Tibosch wrote:
> Hi Andy, Mika,
>
> On 8 Feb 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> Some of the platform devices rely on the name of their driver to match with.
>> In
>> the current implementation, if platform id table is needed, they have to add
>> the name to th
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Hein Tibosch wrote:
> Hi Andy, Mika,
>
> On 8 Feb 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> Some of the platform devices rely on the name of their driver to match with.
>> In
>> the current implementation, if platform id table is needed, they have to add
>> the name to th
Hi Andy, Mika,
On 8 Feb 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Some of the platform devices rely on the name of their driver to match with.
> In
> the current implementation, if platform id table is needed, they have to add
> the name to the platform id table which sounds alogical. The patch adjustes
>
Some of the platform devices rely on the name of their driver to match with. In
the current implementation, if platform id table is needed, they have to add
the name to the platform id table which sounds alogical. The patch adjustes the
logic of the id table matching to make sure we will fall-back
5 matches
Mail list logo