Re: [PATCH] platform: Introduce button support for the Surface 3

2016-12-13 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > The Surface 3 is not following the ACPI spec for PNP0C40, but nearly. > The device is connected to a I2C device that might have some magic > but we don't know about. > Just create the device after the enumeration and use the declared GPIO

Re: [PATCH] platform: Introduce button support for the Surface 3

2016-12-08 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Dec 07 2016 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > The Surface 3 is not following the ACPI spec for PNP0C40, but nearly. > > The device is connected to a I2C device that might have some magic > > but we don't know about. >

Re: [PATCH] platform: Introduce button support for the Surface 3

2016-12-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > The Surface 3 is not following the ACPI spec for PNP0C40, but nearly. > The device is connected to a I2C device that might have some magic > but we don't know about. > Just create the device after the enumeration and use the decl

[PATCH] platform: Introduce button support for the Surface 3

2016-12-05 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
The Surface 3 is not following the ACPI spec for PNP0C40, but nearly. The device is connected to a I2C device that might have some magic but we don't know about. Just create the device after the enumeration and use the declared GPIOs to provide button support. This driver is just an adaptation of