Hi Grant,
On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:05:14 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> In a nutshell,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:05:14 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> In a nutshell, we have to exercise the platform device subsystem, in ways
> tha
Hi Greg,
On Jan 18, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> It might make sense for the of_device_* functions that are duplicating
>> platform_device_* functions to be removed, and their functionality to
>> be subsumed
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> It might make sense for the of_device_* functions that are duplicating
> platform_device_* functions to be removed, and their functionality to
> be subsumed by platform_device_*, possibly by calling some helper functions
> in dr
Hi Greg,
On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
In a nutshell, we have to exercise the platform device subsystem, in ways
that never happened before, so all sorts of weird bugs that no-one has seen
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> In a nutshell, we have to exercise the platform device subsystem, in ways
> >> that never happened before, so all sorts of weird bugs that no-one has seen
> >> before.
> >
> > Why do you have to do this? What are you doing th
Hi Greg,
On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 06:50:19PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Greg,
On
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 06:50:19PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri
On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:31:10AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Platform device rem
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:31:10AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Platform device removal uncovered a number of problems with
> >> the way resources
Hi Greg,
On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:31:10AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Platform device removal uncovered a number of problems with
>> the way resources are handled in the core platform code.
>>
>> Resources now form child/parent li
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:31:10AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Platform device removal uncovered a number of problems with
> the way resources are handled in the core platform code.
>
> Resources now form child/parent linkages and this requires
> proper linking of the resources. On top of th
Platform device removal uncovered a number of problems with
the way resources are handled in the core platform code.
Resources now form child/parent linkages and this requires
proper linking of the resources. On top of that the OF core
directly creates it's own platform devices. Simplify things
by
13 matches
Mail list logo
