On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:38:50AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> CC-ing Frederic as he wrote the comm change.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Currently the se_cmp and se_collapse use pointer comparison,
> > which is ok for for testing equality of str
Hi Jiri,
CC-ing Frederic as he wrote the comm change.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Currently the se_cmp and se_collapse use pointer comparison,
> which is ok for for testing equality of strings. It's not ok
> as comparing function for rbtree insertion, because it g
Currently the se_cmp and se_collapse use pointer comparison,
which is ok for for testing equality of strings. It's not ok
as comparing function for rbtree insertion, because it gives
different results based on current pointer values.
We saw test 32 (hists cumulation test) failing based on differen
3 matches
Mail list logo