* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2016 11:42 PM, "Ingo Molnar" wrote:
> >
> >
> > * r...@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> > > (v3: address comments raised by Frederic)
> > >
> > > Running with nohz_full introduces a fair amount of overhead.
> > > Specifically, various things that are usually done f
On Jan 31, 2016 11:42 PM, "Ingo Molnar" wrote:
>
>
> * r...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> > (v3: address comments raised by Frederic)
> >
> > Running with nohz_full introduces a fair amount of overhead.
> > Specifically, various things that are usually done from the
> > timer interrupt are now done at sy
* r...@redhat.com wrote:
> (v3: address comments raised by Frederic)
>
> Running with nohz_full introduces a fair amount of overhead.
> Specifically, various things that are usually done from the
> timer interrupt are now done at syscall, irq, and guest
> entry and exit times.
>
> However, som
3 matches
Mail list logo