On 3/17/2021 9:30 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
Is it serious or just a joke? :)
I would prefer to not be compatible (at least not until someone complains),
but if compatibility is required then yes opting in to the broken
format would be better. Perhaps not with that name.
And the option could be
> Is it serious or just a joke? :)
I would prefer to not be compatible (at least not until someone complains),
but if compatibility is required then yes opting in to the broken
format would be better. Perhaps not with that name.
And the option could be hidden in the perf config file instead
of be
On 3/17/2021 5:55 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:02:20PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:05:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
looks ok, but maybe make the option more related to CVS,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:02:20PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:05:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > > looks ok, but maybe make the option more related to CVS, like:
> > > >
> > > > --x-su
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:05:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > looks ok, but maybe make the option more related to CVS, like:
> > >
> > > --x-summary, --cvs-summary ...?
> >
> > Actually I don't think it should
Em Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > looks ok, but maybe make the option more related to CVS, like:
> >
> > --x-summary, --cvs-summary ...?
>
> Actually I don't think it should be a new option. I doubt
> anyone could parse the previous mess. So just make it defau
> looks ok, but maybe make the option more related to CVS, like:
>
> --x-summary, --cvs-summary ...?
Actually I don't think it should be a new option. I doubt
anyone could parse the previous mess. So just make it default
with -x
-Andi
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 03:29:00PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> > perf-stat has supported the summary mode. But the summary
> > lines break the CSV output so it's hard for scripts to parse
> > the result.
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > # perf sta
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 03:29:00PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> perf-stat has supported the summary mode. But the summary
> lines break the CSV output so it's hard for scripts to parse
> the result.
>
> Before:
>
> # perf stat -x, -I1000 --interval-count 1 --summary
>1.001323097,8013.48,msec
perf-stat has supported the summary mode. But the summary
lines break the CSV output so it's hard for scripts to parse
the result.
Before:
# perf stat -x, -I1000 --interval-count 1 --summary
1.001323097,8013.48,msec,cpu-clock,8013483384,100.00,8.013,CPUs utilized
1.001323097,270,,
10 matches
Mail list logo