Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix some option handling on --stdio

2015-05-14 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Arnaldo, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:07:19PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:03:26AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > > There's a bug that perf report sometimes ignore some options on --stdio > > output. This bug is triggered only if a related config variable

Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix some option handling on --stdio

2015-05-13 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:03:26AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > There's a bug that perf report sometimes ignore some options on --stdio > output. This bug is triggered only if a related config variable is > set. For example, let's assume we have a following config file. Testing, please next t

[PATCH] perf report: Fix some option handling on --stdio

2015-05-13 Thread Namhyung Kim
There's a bug that perf report sometimes ignore some options on --stdio output. This bug is triggered only if a related config variable is set. For example, let's assume we have a following config file. $ cat ~/.perfconfig [call-graph] print-type = graph [hist] percentage = absolut