On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:47:42PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I found the problem. It still exists upstream , just very tricky to
> trigger.
> Took me lots of time with gdb + watchpoints to track this down, where
> in fact it was just in front of me.
>
> From the crashdump:
>
Hi,
Ok, I found the problem. It still exists upstream , just very tricky to trigger.
Took me lots of time with gdb + watchpoints to track this down, where
in fact it was just in front of me.
>From the crashdump:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
free_dup_event (oe=0x26a39a0
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 12:11:05PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Jiri,
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 1:50 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 01:16:22AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:20 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:2
Jiri,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 1:50 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 01:16:22AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:20 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:23:35PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > > Depending on memory allocations, i
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 01:16:22AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:20 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:23:35PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Depending on memory allocations, it was possible to get a SEGFAULT in
> > > free_dup_event() because
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:20 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:23:35PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Depending on memory allocations, it was possible to get a SEGFAULT in
> > free_dup_event() because the event pointer was bogus:
> >
> > perf[1354]: segfault at 000
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:23:35PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Depending on memory allocations, it was possible to get a SEGFAULT in
> free_dup_event() because the event pointer was bogus:
>
> perf[1354]: segfault at 0006 ip 004b7fc7
is there any reproducer?
>
> Initial
Depending on memory allocations, it was possible to get a SEGFAULT in
free_dup_event() because the event pointer was bogus:
perf[1354]: segfault at 0006 ip 004b7fc7
Initially, I thought it was some double free. But it turns out
it looked more like a buffer overrun. Adding padd
8 matches
Mail list logo