Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump

2012-07-11 Thread David Ahern
On 7/10/12 11:14 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote: Does this fix it for you: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/405 Yeah, same problem. But the question is if there have some sample event with raw data in perf.data, are we still just exit(1)? or let perf-lock only report those sample events with raw data? per

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump

2012-07-10 Thread Jovi Zhang
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Ahern wrote: > On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jovi Zhang >> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH] pe

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump

2012-07-10 Thread David Ahern
On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote: From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jovi Zhang Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump Check sample type event raw_data is existed in perf.data firstly, then

[PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump

2012-07-10 Thread Jovi Zhang
>From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jovi Zhang Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump Check sample type event raw_data is existed in perf.data firstly, then invoke process_raw_event, otherwise it w